Tag » drama

Tube talk: 2008-09 TV season report card

Television.  Love it or hate it, it sure beats reading or taking out the garbage.  I don’t post all that frequently about TV on this site, but man do I spend a truckload of time watching it.  So here’s a breakdown of the shows I watched over this past television season, and what I thought of them.  Overall it was a pretty good year, and the spectre of the writers’ strike is already a distant memory.

American Dad - Stan and RogerAmerican Dad! – I can only guess that more of Seth MacFarlane’s attention has been directed towards this show than Family Guy, which is the reason it has consistently been the funnier of the two.  Or maybe he isn’t overseeing it, and that’s why it’s funnier.  Either way, this season saw a drop in quality from the previous few but was still pretty good.  Any bit with a Roger/Steve pairing was usually pretty good, but there were good laughs to be had elsewhere as well (Steve and friends facing off against the cool kids at school and the inspired Roger/Hayley costume switching gag to name a few).

One of the best elements of American Dad! is its willingness to explore Roger’s various neuroses and personalities for something other than comedy.  “The One That Got Away” is a prime example – Roger tracks down an unknown crook who maxed out his credit card, and it turns out to be himself living a completely separate life.  This kind of relatively nuanced writing has been done before on AD and I hope to see more of it. Final grade: B-

…keep digging Tube talk: 2008-09 TV season report card


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

Tube talk: Lie to Me

I’m tired of always being Johnny-come-lately when it comes to hip new shows.  So when I saw the previews for Fox’s newest drama, Lie to Me, a few weeks ago I thought it looked like a good chance to get on the ground floor of something decent.  Having watched the pilot episode I think I may have found something worth following, which means it will probably be canceled by February.  That’s not to say I was blown away by it, but I’m intrigued enough to set a series recording on my DVR, so that’s gotta be worth something.

Here’s the gist of Lie to Me: It stars Tim Roth as Dr. Cal Lightman, a freelance expert in the practice of detecting deception (the character is based on real-life deception expert Paul Ekman).  He was formerly employed by Uncle Sam, but now runs the for-profit Lightman Group.  Lightman and team (played by Kelli Williams, Monica Raymund, and Brendan Hines) are hired by government agencies, local police, businesses, etc. to help ferret out liars and maybe solve some crimes.

Lightman’s special skill is that he can spot a liar within a few seconds by picking up on the slightest of body movements.  So basically he’s like a cross between Dr. Gregory House and the guys from The Mentalist and Psych.

Tim Roth in "Lie to Me"

In the pilot episode Lightman and the gang are working two cases at once.  The first involves the death of a high school teacher, and the team’s quest to both find the killer and prove the innocence of the prime suspect – a sexually repressed teenager and Jehovah’s Witness.  The second case sees the group looking to clear the good name of a Democratic congressman accused of paying for sex.  As Lightman pithily observes, “we all pay for sex one way or another.”  Or something like that.

Roth is a capable actor and not without his charms, but he’s going to need to step it up a bit if he’s going to carry the weight of an entire series.  That’s because his co-stars are pretty milquetoast, with the exception of Raymund as Ria Torres, a sassy Latina who was recruited from the ranks of the TSA for her natural ability to spot liars.  She spends most of the episode being incredulous over Ligthman’s shenanigans, and is effectively the foil of the group.

Whether or not Lie to Me succeeds will likely hinge on how well the writers can expand beyond the whole “liar liar, pants on fire” gimmick and flesh out the characters.  House has done this successfully despite still being very formulaic, so it’s not without precedent.  But I won’t judge the show too harshly based on one pilot episode (that’s what dimwitted studio executives are for).  It kept me entertained for an hour, and that’s really the important thing, isn’t it?


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

Geek alert: New Star Trek photos

Courtesy the MTV Movies Blog, a half-dozen production photos from the upcoming J.J. Abrams Star Trek movie are online for your geek pleasure.  Actually, they’ve just collected the photos from various other sites, and so I’ve done the same for you.  Enjoy!

1. Eric Bana as Nero, waiting to hear back from the casting director for the new reality series Romulan Ink.


2. A Federation ship identified as the USS Kelvin takes a wrong turn and ends up somewhere over Camden, NJ.


3. Ain’t no party like a Federation party, ’cause a Federation party don’t stop!  (l to r.: Anton Yelchin as Chekov, Chris Pine as James T. Kirk, Simon Pegg as Lt. Montgomery Scott, Karl Urban as Dr. McCoy, John Cho as Sulu, and Zoe Saldana as Uhura)


4. Zachary “Sylar” Quinto shows some of that famous Vulcan even temper.  I can’t wait for him to flick his finger and cut a guy’s head open.


5. I hope Kirk saved the receipt for his GPS navigation system, because he looks pretty screwed here.  “Tom Toooooooooooooooom!”


6. And the money shot!  Apparently J.J. Abrams’ vision of the future involves lots of blue light and a ton of Plexiglas.


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

Little People, Big World drinking game

It snuck up on me, but sure enough the newest season of TLC’s dwarf docudrama Little People, Big World is upon us.  The first episode was heartwarming enough – Roloff family patriarch and little person Matt Roloff traveled to Baghdad to visit an Iraqi family with three dwarf children, as a precursor to getting them some much-needed medical attention.

But I’m certain that soon enough the Roloffs will be back to their old ways, and so fans of the show can up their enjoyment with this handy drinking game.  And hey, even if you’re not a fan you can print this out, watch the show, and still have tons of fun!


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

Can Heroes win back my love?

I didn’t write about Heroes much (at all) last season, and for good reason.  After a brilliant debut, the second season pretty much redefined “letdown”.  You know this, the fans know this, and even creator Tim Kring knows this.  So the show’s third volume – “Villains”, which debuted with two episodes last night – is crucial to the success of the third season and the show’s future.

It’s going to take some time for me to really immerse myself back into the world of Heroes again, but so far so good.  The balance between action and drama – draction – was just about right.  Seeing as the last new episode aired about 10 months ago, I found it surprisingly easy to pick up the show’s various storylines.  That probably also has to do with some of the lamer ones being done or forgotten entirely.

So let’s start with the positive – adding new villains to the mix is a good idea.  I loves me some Sylar, but without the element of surprise or mystery he enjoyed in the first season, he doesn’t seem quite as malevolent.  The new baddies who busted out of Primatech’s holding cells seem like a particularly amoral and violent bunch, as evidenced by their murderous protest over high gas prices.  The heroism of the show’s main characters only works convincingly when contrasted against ultimate evil, and right now Sylar doesn’t cut it anymore.

And as I mentioned earlier, there are good doses of action to go along with the more slowly developing parts.  And let’s face it – the fun in this show has nothing to do with seeing if the heroes get to save the world.  It’s frigging NBC, you know the world will not blow up on this show (not for long anyway).  So that whole conceit is a non-starter.  No, the fun part of the show is watching one set of freaky people fight the other set of freaky people.  And last night they sure got their freak on.

Even Mohinder got into the act, when he very wisely injected himself with an experimental serum designed to throw his adrenal gland into overdrive and get some powers of his own.  And true to form, it appears to be backfiring nicely, so it looks like we’ll get to see the modern equivalent of Brundlefly.  Apparently the power to get a clue will continue to elude poor Mohinder

Most importantly, it looks as if many of the main characters will be used to their full potential again.  Hiro is back in the present and is already mixing it up, and Peter seems to have found more constructive uses of his time than chasing after distressed Irish barmaids.  And even Noah Bennet is back in action after his release from Primatech.

There were only a few sour notes last night, in fact.  I know a lot of people have the hots for Ali Larter, but she really is a lousy actress and adds little to the show.  But if they have to keep her around it’s good to see they may have ditched the “Jikki” premise and given her a whole new character.  And I wasn’t entirely pleased to see the return of Maya, one half of the Weepy Latin Twins combo of season 2.  But even her tendency toward whininess was curbed somewhat by her horrible taste in men.

There are a ton of other points I could get into, but this really isn’t meant to be as much of a review/summary as it is a list of impressions. So all this is to say that I was obviously interested enough in Heroes – despite last year – to watch the first two episodes.  And while it’s still very early in the game, the signs of a turnaround for the show are present.  Whether or not the show can win back my love remains to be seen, but we’ll at least continue seeing each other for awhile longer.


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

GFS at the Movies: The Dark Knight

The most dangerous villains, the scariest ones to watch, are the ones with no clear reasons or motives behind their mayhem.  They enter from the darkest corners of our imaginations and exist solely to inflict pain on others.  They are not driven by greed, revenge, or lust for power.

So how does someone (say, a hero or a district attorney) on the side of right stop such a villain?  How much are they willing to compromise themselves; and how much collateral damage is acceptable in the process?

This is the central theme of The Dark Knight, the second of the Christopher Nolan-helmed Batman reboot films.  It is a superhero movie only in the sense that its characters have their origins in the paneled pages of comic books.  In almost every other way it’s dense and unsettling psychological exploration that happens to feature fantastical costumes, expansive set pieces, and lots of explosions.

Heath Ledger as The Joker

Heath Ledger as The Joker

The villain I’m speaking about is, of course, the Joker.  In the hands of Nolan and the late Heath Ledger, the most notorious of Batman’s arch nemeses transcends the bounds of traditional villainy (or even super-villainy) and lives in the territory of soulless movie monsters like Michael Myers or Jason Vorhees.  Ledger inhabited the role with such abandon and glee that I was able to put the tragic circumstances of his death almost completely out of my mind – although I am not going so far as to peg his performance as Oscar-worthy.

Ledger’s Joker is so unhinged, so unpredictably lethal, that even the combined forces of Gotham City’s organized crime syndicates (save one) eagerly accept his offer to rid them of Batman (Christian Bale), who along with Lt. James Gordon (Gary Oldman) is actually making some progress at restoring law and order to Gotham.  But Batman and Gordon have never faced a threat like the Joker.

D.A Harvey Dent, Lt. Gordon, and Batman chat

D.A Harvey Dent, Lt. Gordon, and Batman chat

Enter new District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), dubbed The White Knight in the film in obvious contrast to Batman.  Dent manages to convince even a skeptical Bruce Wayne that he can stand up to the forces of evil and win; or at least make progress.  By his side is Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal, taking Katie Holmes’s place), and voilà – your love triangle.  All of them and more are brought to the brink by the Joker’s rampage through Gotham.

The Dark Knight squeezes every ounce out of its PG-13 rating that a movie possibly can.  It’s every bit as grim and violent as the ad campaign portrays, and then some.  To Nolan’s credit, however, there is little in the way of outright gore even though the body count is just this side of your average horror film.

But the true darkness of this Bat-film lies in its psychological element.  Whereas Batman Begins was relatively sparse and subdued movie until the climactic third act, The Dark Knight provides little breathing room.  The tension is established in the opening scene and, despite the substantial amount of dialogue and character development, never really lets up.  Violent confrontation and disaster lurk around every corner, but the feelings of fear, mistrust, self-doubt, and isolation brought on by the Joker extend to everyone else in the film.

Christian Bale as Batman

Christian Bale as Batman

The impact of this after two-and-a-half hours is a bit fatigiung, to be honest.  I can only guess that co-writers Christopher and Jonathan Nolan meant to provide the audience with a sense of what it’s like to actually live in this world of constant peril, instead of simply calmly observing it.  It certainly was in stark contrast to the more traditional film I was expecting.

But the bottom line is that in most ways, The Dark Knight lives up to the hype.  It’s crammed with excellent performances (even though a certain villain, who shall not be named here, is sadly wasted) and manages to pack in plenty of story in between explosions.  So much, in fact, that I think a second viewing is in order.

The Dark Knight takes the superhero genre to a place where few other movies have succeeded in going, and stands as the culmination of the new breed of comic-based films in terms of gritty realism and gloom (even bordering on nihilism).  Where Nolan (assuming he continues the series) and other superhero franchises will go from here will be fascinating to observe.


View Comments

Share/Bookmark

Movie Review: The Great Escape

Due to time constraints I wasn’t able to enjoy yet another Band of Brothers marathon over the Memorial Day weekend. But all was not lost as I finally got to catch a viewing of The Great Escape, which I had never seen before. And I’m pleased to say that for the most part, the film’s reputation as a classic is well-earned.

The Great Escape (1963)

The basic premise of the movie is thus: It’s World War II and the German High Command, tired of dealing with the expense and effort involved with keeping some of their most escape-prone POWs imprisoned, has designed a newer and supposedly better prison camp (Stalag Luft III) where it sends the craftiest Allied prisoners. Seems like a swell idea on paper, but what it effectively did was to help the smartest and most resourceful POWs pool their resources and concoct an even better escape plan. A “great” escape plan, if you will.

…keep digging Movie Review: The Great Escape


View Comments

Share/Bookmark